Thursday, November 1, 2012

Democracy: Dying From Within?


OPINION: The core values of personal freedom and equality have been narrowed to the point that they are now vices.

 


Shutterstock
– Shutterstock
Our declining democracy seems to be dying a slow, certain death. And this death comes not from outside threats and circumstance. It is degenerating from within, dying from the inside out. And the causes are many. Oddly, two of the primary causes are two of democracy’s core values: personal freedom and equality.
Even though our nation was “conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal,” our democracy declines for these very reasons. It declines because many of our present political and cultural leaders see the principles of individual freedom and equality so narrowly and childishly that these noble virtues have become vices.
Today, personal freedom has become an insistent, incessant individualism. It is a childish, immature, spoiled view of personal freedom, a freedom without boundaries or judgment. And that view of liberty is not a moral, rational or even a practical vision. It is, by definition, self-indulgent and, by extension, sociopathic. It is, by implication, the doorway to decadence and depravity.
And, like spoiled children, the leadership elite and their complicit followers also demand equality, interpreted to mean mathematical fairness without regard to effort or free will. They want everyone to get the same amount, have the same thing, no matter what. And, to make this happen, they will use governmental authority to enforce equality without regards to morality or justice or even personal freedom.
This is why many politicians and socialistic ideologues enviously vilify the wealthy. This is why their policies undermine the virtue of hard work and commandeer the accrued rewards that derive from effort and enterprise. This is why they no longer strive for equal opportunities, but insist on the equality of outcomes.
Like children, they are envious of those who have achieved a measure of success. And they wrap it in the rhetoric of fairness and compassion. They accuse the wealthy of greed and reveal their own greedy envy by their rapacious rhetoric and their high-handed tactics of big government, rather than properly balancing their rhetoric and tactics in a manner that appeals to the moral obligations inherent in the rewards of effort and enterprise.
These leaders and their followers have lost the necessary integration inherent in all sound morality. For any moral virtue left untethered from other pertinent virtues inevitably becomes a vice. Just think of any person who values honesty over all other moral principles. If honesty is not restrained and tempered by discretion, compassion and love, it becomes a character flaw, a moral vice. Such is the case with equality.
Similarly, freedom is not a virtue unless it is used rightly. Real freedom is always subject to moral review. And all decisions become a matter of morality. But because our culture distorts freedom, denying the essential moral evaluation of all free-will acts, our nation and our culture endorse sins of all types and castigate those who rightly judge freedom’s uses along moral lines.
This is why our leaders and our culture despise any attempt to judge any belief or behavior on moral grounds. Now, personal freedom has become immune to evaluation and judgment. But freedom without moral evaluation is not freedom. It is license, plain and simple.
So, how has this childish philosophy that distorts equality and denies moral judgment caused our democracy to decline? The evidence is all around us.
Familiar examples of the tyranny of untethered equality are evident in the monotonous rhetoric of “race,” “class” and “gender.” While equity of opportunity is a fair, moral goal, the equality of outcome is the product of envy, not justice or compassion, despite their rhetoric.
The distortion of equality is also clear in the relentless surge of socialistic movements and the expanding power the government and its bureaucracies continue to confer. The “Occupy” movement’s envious and destructive disregard for personal achievement and property is just such a socialistic program fueled by envy. The federal government’s ever-expanding regulatory control and the health-care mandates inflicted on private, religious institutions, regardless of the moral imperatives of religious and moral freedom, are some familiar attempts at equality without regard to other moral principles such as religious expression and the morality of life.
And, when it comes to personal freedom, we need look no further than the television screen or the headlines. The homosexual agenda, rampant promiscuity and pornography, violence, abortion, euthanasia, greed, materialism, divorce and profanity are familiar effects of unrestrained individual freedom. This litany of depravity is significant in its ubiquity and in the endorsement and encouragement of many of these sins in law and in culture.
When government and culture become the instruments of deliberate distortions of such beliefs and a great mass of people are complicit in this, democracy dies. The forms may remain, but the substance is lost. For democracy rests on freedom and equality as two of its principles, but not its only two.
Democracy thrives on the moral conviction that right and wrong exist. It thrives on the fact that we are all equally subject to moral imperatives, moral standards, moral judgments. It thrives on the idea that goodness must be sought and lived and that evil must be acknowledged and avoided. It thrives on the love of truth and the truth of love.
So, what must we do as followers of Christ? First, we must meet these challenges with informed and resolute action. For many in our nation no longer seek to build a more righteous, a more moral society founded on reason and on natural law, as our founders intended. And we must persuade them that their beliefs are bereft of real truth and moral rectitude.
Second, we must recover the real purposes of democracy. Democracy’s purpose is not to create a society devoid of differences, a socialistic society where personal achievement, individual stewardship and personal property are anti-social vices. It is not to create an amoral, personally free society where individuals cross all moral boundaries with impunity. It is to create a good society, a noble society, a virtuous society, a loving society. These are the purposes of real democracy, a democracy resting on the truth of goodness, nobility, virtue and love.
And these purposes are the very purposes God intends for human society. For as children of God, we know we are our brothers’ keepers. We are bound to help the less fortunate, the lost, the blind, the sinful. And, as disciples of Christ, we are also bound to the "Great Commission," to make disciples of all nations. And, as we relentlessly bring the full Gospel of love and of truth to our nation and our world, we must bear the suffering, lovingly preaching and embodying the truth, in season and out of season. For even the gates of hell will not prevail against us, as Jesus assures us.
And finally, let us do so “with malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right.” And “let us strive on to finish the work we are in,” so help us God.
Frank Cronin writes from eastern Connecticut.

When in Cebu City, please visit gregmelep.com for your real estate and retirement needs. 

SWS: Corruption In LGUs Rising


By ELLALYN B. DE VERA
October 30, 2012, 7:11pm
MANILA, Philippines --- More Filipinos believe that corruption in local government units (LGUs) is more widespread now than in the past year, based on the latest Social Weather Stations (SWS) survey results.
The nationwide 2012 Good Local Governance Survey, conducted among 1,500 household heads from Aug. 20 to 28, found that 56 percent of Filipinos still consider the level of corruption now in the city/municipality government as similar to the level a year ago, 33 percent said it is more widespread now, and 23 percent said it is more widespread last year.
The SWS noted that those who see “a lot” of corruption in the city/municipal government hardly changed from 25 percent this year to 22 percent last year.
As compared to last year, the same offices where corruption is considered most widespread occupy the top three positions, namely, the Budget Office (from 40 percent to 48 percent), Mayor’s Office (from 30 percent to 32 percent), and the Engineer’s Office (from 20 percent to 30 percent).
The SWS also listed the top 11 offices where corruption happens. These are the Treasurer’s Office (27 percent, up from 5th to 6th), Business Permit and Licensing Office (24 percent, stayed at 5th place), Transport and Traffic Management Office (19 percent, up from 7th place), Accountant Office (18 percent, up from 9th place), and Public Market Office (16 percent, up from 12th rank), Barangay Affairs and Public Assistance Center (13 percent, down from 4th place), Assessors Office (13 percent, up from 13th to 14th place), and Agriculture Office (13 percent, down from 8th place).
Over the past three years, Filipinos’ awareness of any anti-corruption effort of the city/municipal government has grown from 26 percent to 35 percent.
The survey also found 73 percent of household heads satisfied, and 14 percent dissatisfied, with the performance of their city/municipal government, for a net satisfaction rating of “very good” +59 (percentage of satisfied minus percentage of dissatisfied).
Net satisfaction ratings are termed as +70 and above, “excellent”; +50 to +69, “very good”; +30 to +49, “good”; +10 to +29, “moderate”, +9 to -9, “neutral”; -10 to -29, “poor”; -30 to -49, “bad”; -50 to -69, “very bad”; -70 and below, “execrable.”
The +59 rating is five points below the very good net rating of +64 (75 percent satisfied, 11 percent dissatisfied) in July 2011, but 15 points above the good +44 (68 percent satisfied, 23 percent dissatisfied in September 2009.
The survey also found 70 percent satisfied and 7 percent dissatisfied with the performance of the Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG), for a very good net satisfaction rating of +63, up by five points from the good +48 (58 percent satisfied, 11 percent dissatisfied) in July 2011.
Very good net satisfaction ratings were also obtained by key local officials and institutions: Governor (down from +67 in July 2011 to +56 in August 2012), Mayor (down from an excellent +73 to +65), Vice-Mayor (down from +68 to +60), Barangay-Chairman (down from an excellent +70 to +63), City/Municipal Council (down from +61 to +57), and City/Municipal Police (hardly moving from +53 to +54).
The 2012 Survey on Good Local Governance was supported through the Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID) and The Asia Foundation (TAF) Partnership in the Philippines.

Democracy: Dying From Within?



OPINION: The core values of personal freedom and equality have been narrowed to the point that they are now vices.

 

Shutterstock
– Shutterstock
Our declining democracy seems to be dying a slow, certain death. And this death comes not from outside threats and circumstance. It is degenerating from within, dying from the inside out. And the causes are many. Oddly, two of the primary causes are two of democracy’s core values: personal freedom and equality.

Even though our nation was “conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal,” our democracy declines for these very reasons. It declines because many of our present political and cultural leaders see the principles of individual freedom and equality so narrowly and childishly that these noble virtues have become vices.

Today, personal freedom has become an insistent, incessant individualism. It is a childish, immature, spoiled view of personal freedom, a freedom without boundaries or judgment. And that view of liberty is not a moral, rational or even a practical vision. It is, by definition, self-indulgent and, by extension, sociopathic. It is, by implication, the doorway to decadence and depravity.
And, like spoiled children, the leadership elite and their complicit followers also demand equality, interpreted to mean mathematical fairness without regard to effort or free will. They want everyone to get the same amount, have the same thing, no matter what. And, to make this happen, they will use governmental authority to enforce equality without regards to morality or justice or even personal freedom.

This is why many politicians and socialistic ideologues enviously vilify the wealthy. This is why their policies undermine the virtue of hard work and commandeer the accrued rewards that derive from effort and enterprise. This is why they no longer strive for equal opportunities, but insist on the equality of outcomes.

Like children, they are envious of those who have achieved a measure of success. And they wrap it in the rhetoric of fairness and compassion. They accuse the wealthy of greed and reveal their own greedy envy by their rapacious rhetoric and their high-handed tactics of big government, rather than properly balancing their rhetoric and tactics in a manner that appeals to the moral obligations inherent in the rewards of effort and enterprise.

These leaders and their followers have lost the necessary integration inherent in all sound morality. For any moral virtue left untethered from other pertinent virtues inevitably becomes a vice. Just think of any person who values honesty over all other moral principles. If honesty is not restrained and tempered by discretion, compassion and love, it becomes a character flaw, a moral vice. Such is the case with equality.

Similarly, freedom is not a virtue unless it is used rightly. Real freedom is always subject to moral review. And all decisions become a matter of morality. But because our culture distorts freedom, denying the essential moral evaluation of all free-will acts, our nation and our culture endorse sins of all types and castigate those who rightly judge freedom’s uses along moral lines.
This is why our leaders and our culture despise any attempt to judge any belief or behavior on moral grounds. Now, personal freedom has become immune to evaluation and judgment. But freedom without moral evaluation is not freedom. It is license, plain and simple.

So, how has this childish philosophy that distorts equality and denies moral judgment caused our democracy to decline? The evidence is all around us.
Familiar examples of the tyranny of untethered equality are evident in the monotonous rhetoric of “race,” “class” and “gender.” While equity of opportunity is a fair, moral goal, the equality of outcome is the product of envy, not justice or compassion, despite their rhetoric.

The distortion of equality is also clear in the relentless surge of socialistic movements and the expanding power the government and its bureaucracies continue to confer. The “Occupy” movement’s envious and destructive disregard for personal achievement and property is just such a socialistic program fueled by envy. The federal government’s ever-expanding regulatory control and the health-care mandates inflicted on private, religious institutions, regardless of the moral imperatives of religious and moral freedom, are some familiar attempts at equality without regard to other moral principles such as religious expression and the morality of life.

And, when it comes to personal freedom, we need look no further than the television screen or the headlines. The homosexual agenda, rampant promiscuity and pornography, violence, abortion, euthanasia, greed, materialism, divorce and profanity are familiar effects of unrestrained individual freedom. This litany of depravity is significant in its ubiquity and in the endorsement and encouragement of many of these sins in law and in culture.
When government and culture become the instruments of deliberate distortions of such beliefs and a great mass of people are complicit in this, democracy dies. The forms may remain, but the substance is lost. For democracy rests on freedom and equality as two of its principles, but not its only two.

Democracy thrives on the moral conviction that right and wrong exist. It thrives on the fact that we are all equally subject to moral imperatives, moral standards, moral judgments. It thrives on the idea that goodness must be sought and lived and that evil must be acknowledged and avoided. It thrives on the love of truth and the truth of love.

So, what must we do as followers of Christ? First, we must meet these challenges with informed and resolute action. For many in our nation no longer seek to build a more righteous, a more moral society founded on reason and on natural law, as our founders intended. And we must persuade them that their beliefs are bereft of real truth and moral rectitude.

Second, we must recover the real purposes of democracy. Democracy’s purpose is not to create a society devoid of differences, a socialistic society where personal achievement, individual stewardship and personal property are anti-social vices. It is not to create an amoral, personally free society where individuals cross all moral boundaries with impunity. It is to create a good society, a noble society, a virtuous society, a loving society. These are the purposes of real democracy, a democracy resting on the truth of goodness, nobility, virtue and love.

And these purposes are the very purposes God intends for human society. For as children of God, we know we are our brothers’ keepers. We are bound to help the less fortunate, the lost, the blind, the sinful. And, as disciples of Christ, we are also bound to the "Great Commission," to make disciples of all nations. And, as we relentlessly bring the full Gospel of love and of truth to our nation and our world, we must bear the suffering, lovingly preaching and embodying the truth, in season and out of season. For even the gates of hell will not prevail against us, as Jesus assures us.

And finally, let us do so “with malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right.” And “let us strive on to finish the work we are in,” so help us God.
Frank Cronin writes from eastern Connecticut.

When in Cebu City, please visit gregmelep.com for your real estate and retirement needs. 

Friday, October 26, 2012

Blu’s prize seen to propel growth



Saturday, October 27, 2012
RADISSON Blu’s first hotel property in the Philippines and in Southeast Asia bagged the Carlson Rezidor Asia Pacific Hotel of the Year Award, besting 58 hotels in Asia Pacific this year.
According to Radisson Blu Hotel Cebu general manager Lyle Lewis, the hotel’s recognition proves that they have been competing strongly in the industry during their two years of operation in the country.
Lewis said the recognition was based on a whole range of criteria that include profitability, employee and customer satisfaction, and feedback reflected in the social media in the past year.
“The hotel scored high not just in one aspect but scored very high in all areas,” Lewis said in a recent interview.
He said the hotel team is optimistic about growth this year following the recognition it got and on the back of Cebu’s healthy tourism industry. He noted it takes about five years of operation for a new property to stabilize operations and become
profitable.
“We have stabilized quickly and we are quite successful in the first two years of operation. We are aiming to continue the growth we have started and eventually achieve that fair market share in the industry,” said Lewis.
The Radisson Blu Hotel Cebu offers 400 rooms and suites, an in-house spa, fitness centre, business centre, and an 800-meter swimming pool.
The hotel is jointly owned by SM Investments Corp. through SM Hotels and Conventions Corp. and Carlson International.
Given the upbeat hotel industry here, Lewis said they aim to be the top hotel for the leisure, corporate and Mice (meeting, incentives, convention and exhibition) markets by delivering improved hotel services.
Lewis noted that Cebu’s local governments should extend support to the hotel industry by improving tourism infrastructure and attraction.
“Continued improvement in the tourism and hotel industry calls for a joint effort by both private and government stakeholders,” said Lewis.
He said international access is also important to lure more foreign tourists to visit Cebu. Lewis is hopeful that Qatar Airways would soon revive flights to and from Cebu.
Lewis noted majority of the hotel’s guest are from the domestic market. Foreign tourists from the United States, Korea and Japan are also the hotel’s feeder markets.
Radisson Blu Hotel Cebu is also gearing up for the holidays when “balikbayan” or Filipino returnees are expected to stay in hotels.
“We are looking at Filipino returnees from countries like North America and Australia to come home for the Christmas holidays,” he said.
Published in the Sun.Star Cebu newspaper on October 27, 2012.

Thursday, October 25, 2012

Supreme Court asked to force Congress to pass antidynasty law


Anticrime crusader Dante Jimenez. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO
A group of petitioners on Thursday asked the Supreme Court to compel Congress to pass a law banning political dynasties, something which they said Congress had “wantonly neglected” to do for 25 years since it was decreed by the 1987 Constitution.
They asked the high court to issue a writ of mandamus against the Senate and the House of Representatives “requiring them to enact a law prohibiting and defining political dynasties as mandated by Article II, Section 26 of the Constitution.”
Among the petitioners who went to the high tribunal on Thursday were lawyer Leonardo de Vera, anticrime crusader Dante Jimenez of the Volunteers against Crime and Corruption and Raymund Jarque.
The group said the petition was a “class suit against the Congress of the Philippines for its failure to perform the task of enacting a law prohibiting political dynasties.”
Appalling inaction

“The inaction of Congress has been appalling. Every bill in Congress against political dynasties was stifled by congressional inaction,” the petitioners said.
Sen. Teofisto Guingona Jr. has signed on as a petitioner but was not with the group Thursday. Guingona is among the lawmakers who have filed bills outlawing political dynasties in the past.
Sen. Miriam Defensor-Santiago has filed a similar measure that is now being discussed at committee level but the bill only deals with political dynasties at the local level.
According to the petition, the history of the past 25 years showed the difficulty in passing an antipolitical dynasty bill.
It said this was the first time that the Supreme Court was being asked to compel Congress to pass a law prohibiting and defining “political dynasty”.

Speedy relief

Speaking to reporters, De Vera said that the group went to the high court so they could get “speedy and immediate” relief.
Jimenez said it looked like there was only two more spots left to vie for in the 12-seat Senate in the coming elections as 10 candidates were sure to win because of their blood ties with incumbent officials and senators.
He said these candidates were: Paolo “Bam” Aquino  and Margarita Coujangco who are related to President Aquino; Nancy Binay, a daughter of Vice President Jejomar Binay; Jack Enrile, the son of Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile; JV Ejercito, half-brother of incumbent Sen. Jinggoy Estrada, both sons of deposed President Joseph Estrada; incumbent Sen. Alan Peter Cayetano, brother of Sen. Pia; Cynthia Villar, the wife of Sen. Manuel Villar; and Aurora Rep. Juan Edgardo Angara,the  son of Sen. Edgardo Angara.
Jimenez said two other senatorial aspirants with political family names—Zambales Rep. Mitos Magsaysay and former senator Ramon Magsaysay Jr.—might also win.
Jimenez called on the candidates to withdraw their candidacy and give way to more qualified aspirants.

When in Cebu City, please visit gregmelep.com for your real estate and retirement needs. Avail of the opportunity to own a condominium unit in Cebu City for only P12,000.00/month with your own parking lot. Hurry while the supply of units last. Just call the Tel. Nos. shown below.
Tel. No. 555-8464/09164422611/09173373687.