Monday, September 19, 2011

Way to peace: justice, fraternal love through solidarity





 0share2 0
In the Inquirer’s headline story in its Sept. 15, 2011 issue, former US Ambassador to the Philippines Kristie Kenney was reported to have sent unclassified memos stating “total victory over the insurgents in the foreseeable future remains unlikely” and “nothing dramatic has changed in the status quo in the long-running saga of the CPP-NPA despite the Philippine government’s announced goal of defeating the NPA within two years and its allocation of additional resources.”
Such gloomy assessments might be justified if the idea of winning were confined to defeating the insurgents with guns and bombs. Where this war should be won is in the minds and hearts of people.
Vatican Council II taught that peace is “the fruit of that right ordering of things with which the divine founder has invested human society and which must be actualized by man thirsting for an ever more perfect reign of justice” (Gaudium et Spes, 78). Peace is the fruit of justice: opus iustitiae pax.
We must learn from Blessed John Paul the Great, who helped in toppling down communist regimes in Eastern Europe in the 1980s and 1990s by dint of preaching—on the dignity of the person, on respect for the person and human rights, and on promoting truth, justice and freedom. He won the battle in men’s minds and hearts.
This is what he declared in his message for peace in 2002: “The enormous suffering of peoples and individuals, even among my own friends and acquaintances, caused by Nazi and communist totalitarianism, has never been far from my thoughts and prayers. I have often paused to reflect on the persistent question: How do we restore the moral and social order subjected to such horrific violence? My reasoned conviction, confirmed in turn by biblical revelation, is that the shattered order cannot be fully restored except by a response that combines justice with forgiveness. The pillars of true peace are justice and that form of love which is forgiveness.”
If we want peace in the South, all parties involved must agree to practice justice (giving to each one his due) and fraternal love through solidarity, which means each one’s concern for the good of others.
The peace talks with the insurgents are a good step forward. I just hope that the parties involved would bear in mind the basic truths about the true sources of peace.
—FR. CECILIO L. MAGSINO, cesmagsino@gmail.com

Family ties





 2share25 22
The family is one of the oldest and most important social institutions on earth. Anthropologist Margaret Mead, based on her research, affirmed the centrality of the nuclear family in human society.  She said: “As far back as our knowledge takes us, human beings have lived in families. We know of no period when this was not so. We know of no people who have succeeded for long in dissolving the family or displacing it… Again and again, in spite of proposals for change and actual experiments, human societies have reaffirmed their dependence on the family as the basic unit of human living—the family of father, mother and children.’’
All over the world, the family is considered the bedrock of a nation, and the Philippines is no exception. Indeed, the Philippines is one country where family ties are the strongest. It is thus fitting that the nation should take some time to reflect on the family and seek to strengthen family unity and relationships by promoting Filipino family values this week, national Family Week.
Michelle Ong, in a paper in 2000, said that the typical Filipino family is “economically disadvantaged’’ (a euphemism for poor), with parents having jobs that cannot provide for all the needs of the family. She also said that the Filipino family is child-centered, with a married couple becoming a family only with the birth of a child. The family is also perceived to be an important aspect of the Filipino’s life as happiness is closely associated with a satisfying and harmonious family situation.
All over the world, the family is being subjected to various stresses and strains, and again, the Philippines is no exception. An East-West paper said that increasing urbanization and industrialization and the high level of poverty have drastically changed Philippine society, and we presume, also the nuclear family. Many children, because of the OFW phenomenon, are growing up under the care of single or surrogate parents.
It is the family that prepares a child for life in the adult world. Here, the child first experiences the love, care and attention that help launch him into a bigger, more complex environment. The parents are the primary influence in molding children’s values, norms, attitudes and standards of right or wrong. Children who spend most of their growing years in an intact family structure generally receive more and better guidance and attention that protect them from engaging in socially unwanted and negative behaviors such as smoking, drug use, drinking or engaging in commercial or premarital sex.
In 2001, the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines lamented in a pastoral statement that many social situations are beginning to destroy or deform the family. The CBCP called poverty “the silent killer of families,’’ forcing many spouses to separate for one or both of them to work abroad. Separation causes children to suffer great psychological harm and sometimes leads to the breakup of families.
The OFW phenomenon has its good and bad effects. Among the good: the children of migrants are better off financially and generally get a better education. But the negative: The migrants’ children are described as lonely, materialistic, consumerist, selfish, anxious and resentful. Many of them feel abandoned. Yes, now the OFW parents are able to maintain constant contact with their children through cell phones, e-mail, Skype, videocams and other state-of-the art gadgets, but they cannot take the place and provide the warmth and love of face-to-face interaction between parent and child.
Many economic and social factors are threatening the unity of marriage and the existence of many families. It is thus necessary that the government solve as soon as possible the perennial problems of poverty and lack of gainful employment, so that more and more parents would stay in the Philippines and continue to care for their children.
As the family suffers the strains and stresses of the modern world, the words of anthropologist Paul Bohannan may be reassuring to all of us: “The family is the most adaptable of all human institutions, changing with every social demand. The family does not break in a storm as oak or pine trees do, but bends before the wind like the bamboo tree in Oriental tales and springs up again.’’

Abalos accused of rigging 2007 polls

By 
r

 5share21 15
Two provincial poll supervisors have accused then Commission on Elections (Comelec) Chairman Benjamin Abalos of rigging the 2007 senatorial balloting to favor Arroyo administration candidates.
Rebutting the charges, Abalos on Monday said that while he was still Comelec chief he had ordered the two poll supervisors—Lilian Suan-Radam of South Cotabato and Yogie Martirizar of North Cotabato—arrested for sabotaging the vote.
Justice Secretary Leila de Lima said Radam and Martirizar had executed an affidavit saying Abalos had ordered them personally to ensure a 12-0 sweep of then President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo’s senatorial slate in their provinces.
De Lima said she informed President Benigno Aquino III before his departure on Sunday night for a five-day visit to the United States about the “explosive” disclosures of the two supervisors that she said could shake up the Comelec.
She said Mr. Aquino ordered a joint Comelec-Department of Justice panel to investigate the charges, “determine the truth and make the people (involved) accountable.”
“Those are very serious allegations and you should pursue and make sure that there are cases that will be filed,” De Lima quoted the President as telling her.
“The President is really alarmed,” she said. “It’s very alarming and disturbing that the special instructions came no less from the former chair of the Comelec, and ostensibly on instructions from the Palace officials at the time.”
“This is the first time that a (former) chair of the Comelec will be put to a serious test with this investigation. It’s only now that somebody pointed to him,” De Lima said.
Asked if now Representative Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo was implicated, De Lima said: “While there may not be a direct hit in so far as Palace personalities are concerned, I think there are enough facts there which provide significant leads to trace who were really involved.”
Abalos denies raps
Reached on his mobile phone, Abalos said he was “surprised” that the same people whom he had ordered arrested in May 2007 “are now being glorified.” He questioned the credibility of Martirizar and Radam.
He said he had ordered the arrest of the two poll supervisors after discrepancies were found in the election documents they had submitted to the Comelec as it was canvassing the votes in their respective regions.
“These people are fugitives from the law and now all of a sudden they are being treated as heroes. They have been hiding for the past four years. Why are they coming out now?”
Abalos said he did not have “direct dealing” with the supervisors, saying it was Election Commissioner Rene Sarmiento who was assigned to oversee the elections in the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao.
Citing a possible threat on their security, De Lima placed Martirizar and Radam under provisional coverage of the Witness Protection Program.
The two women, looking nervous but composed, appeared at a news conference with De Lima.
Isafp implicated
Radam said she had received calls purportedly from the Intelligence Service of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (Isafp) telling her to keep silent.
She said she and Martirizar finally came out in the open “because this time there is an investigation going on and those doing the investigation are ready to listen to us.”
Both Martirizar and Radam said in their respective sworn statements that the order to rig the vote to favor Arroyo candidates and certain party-list representatives came from their “handlers” from Isafp—a Captain Peter Reyes and a Major Joey Lleaban—and then acting Regional Director Michael Abas.
However, Martirizar and Radam also said in their separate affidavits that as Election Day neared, Abalos himself called for another meeting in Davao City with Abas, provincial election supervisors and regional directors during which Abalos reiterated the instructions for a 12-0 win of all administration candidates.
“It is emphasized that the instructions (came) from the top, which we clearly understood to be the President,” Radam said.
Martirizar said that Abalos told them that on Election Day, May 14, the election supervisors would be provided with “extra copies of statement of votes (SoVs), certificate of proclamations and other election forms bearing the same serial number as what was officially issued to our province, and that we should use the same to alter the results.”
Abalos also said the election supervisors would be provided “with anything that we need including persons who will help us do the work,” Martirizar said.
She added that Abalos, after the meeting, approached her and told her that her “future” in the Comelec was in his hands “so I have to follow him or else I would be terminated from service.”
Favored candidates
The day before Election Day, Martirizar said Abas gave her a list of senatorial candidates that should be in the top 12: Ralph Recto; Miriam Defensor-Santiago; Prospero Pichay; Joker Arroyo; Vic Magsaysay; and Vicente “Tito” Sotto III.
On Election Day, Martirizar’s military handler, Reyes, reminded her of the “12-0 instructions.”
She said she tried to reason that it was difficult to alter the results because there were lawyers and watchers during the canvassing, and that her initial assessment showed that it would be “impossible” to have a 12-0 result.
Martirizar told Reyes that then senatorial candidates Loren Legarda, Panfilo Lacson and Francis Escudero received “very high number of votes.”
Reyes called up somebody, she said, and then handed her a “priority list”: Edgardo Angara, Arroyo, Magsaysay, Recto and Juan Miguel Zubiri.
Radam, for her part, said that she told her military handlers that only Angara and Arroyo could have the possibility of landing in the Top 12, “or at most, Zubiri.”
When she also said that it would be difficult to alter the votes because of the candidates’ watchers, Radam’s handlers told her that a way had been devised to give high votes to Defensor, Recto, Angara, Arroyo, Pichay, Zubiri, Sotto and Magsaysay.
She said she was also instructed to shave off at least 100,000 votes from then senatorial candidates Alan Peter Cayetano and Antonio Trillanes IV.
Both Radam and Martirizar were told that they were constantly being monitored by the military and that even their phones, including Abas’, was being tapped.
Radam said that persons she did not know had prepared the election results and had also placed these inside the ballot box to be submitted to the national board of canvassers.
She said she wasn’t even able to go over the documents.
There were also three people, allegedly from Malacañang, who gave Martirizar the blank election documents “with exactly the same serial numbers as that of the official copies already distributed to different municipalities.”
The forms, they told Martirizar, came from Abalos and Malacañang.
Original posted: 7:25 pm | Monday, September 19th, 2011